Deep Thoughts on Tiger Woods (two of 'em!)
Dec. 1st, 2009 07:08 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
the_archfiend1) I probably find this entire story as amusing as the next guy, but one thing amazes me: has any celebrity who could suffer some serious financial damage in a messy, highly public divorce ever considered the idea of handing a future spouse a pre-nup that specifically states that he (or, to be fair, she) will not cough up oodles of their own hard-earned cash if an affair comes to light unless said affair wrecks a partnership in, say, a co-owned production company or the like?
Yeah, I know that this would make divorce lawyers oh so sad and is probably a bit naive if Hubby or Wifey insists on their partner being completely, utterly loyal.
IMHO, It's even more naive to think that celebs will tread the straight and narrow after being publically hunted by publicity-hungry sex objects of convenience for years on end.
2) If current rumors are to be believed, this wasn't Tiger's only dalliance. It may not even be his twentieth.
I fully expect us to be awash in this crap throughout most of 2010 if the usual Infotainment outlets have their say.
Anybody got a cave for rent?
Yeah, I know that this would make divorce lawyers oh so sad and is probably a bit naive if Hubby or Wifey insists on their partner being completely, utterly loyal.
IMHO, It's even more naive to think that celebs will tread the straight and narrow after being publically hunted by publicity-hungry sex objects of convenience for years on end.
2) If current rumors are to be believed, this wasn't Tiger's only dalliance. It may not even be his twentieth.
I fully expect us to be awash in this crap throughout most of 2010 if the usual Infotainment outlets have their say.
Anybody got a cave for rent?
